tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8983386.post8866785094757543879..comments2024-03-12T04:51:46.468-05:00Comments on Blue Gal: Sexism and SarahFran / Blue Galhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18293627981248346055noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8983386.post-62088341574729040682009-06-14T06:40:08.774-05:002009-06-14T06:40:08.774-05:00Anybody happen to catch all those hot Iranian wome...Anybody happen to catch all those hot Iranian women protesting the stolen election? OMG!!!!Bladerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12381208023240553003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8983386.post-63892926588449583412009-06-13T23:51:38.081-05:002009-06-13T23:51:38.081-05:00DAVID LETTERMAN'S HATE, ETC. !
David...DAVID LETTERMAN'S HATE, ETC. ! <br /><br /> David Letterman's hate is as old as some ancient Hebrew prophets.<br /> Speaking of anti-Semitism, it's Jerry Falwell and other fundy leaders who've gleefully predicted that in the future EVERY nation will be against Israel (an international first?) and that TWO-THIRDS of all Jews will be killed, right? <br /> Wrong! It's the ancient Hebrew prophet Zechariah who predicted all this in the 13th and 14th chapters of his book! The last prophet, Malachi, explains the reason for this future Holocaust that'll outdo even Hitler's by stating that "Judah hath dealt treacherously" and "the Lord will cut off the man that doeth this" and asks "Why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother?"<br /> Haven't evangelicals generally been the best friends of Israel and Jewish persons? Then please explain the recent filthy, hate-filled, back-stabbing tirades by David Letterman (and Sandra Bernhard) against a leading evangelical named Sarah Palin, and explain why most Jewish leaders have seemingly condoned Palin's continuing "crucifixion"!<br /> While David and Sandra are tragically turning comedy into tragedy, they are also helping to speed up and fulfill the Final Holocaust a la Zechariah and Malachi, thus helping to make the Bible even more believable! <br /> (For even more stunning information, visit MSN and type in "Separation of Raunch and State" and "Bible Verses Obama Avoids.")Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8983386.post-37937305474949773562009-06-13T15:39:10.804-05:002009-06-13T15:39:10.804-05:00I have to disagree with you. By courting the crazy...I have to disagree with you. By courting the crazy, insane, violent right wingers Karl Rove has stopped many abortions. The killings of doctors, attacks on clinics etc has eliminated the availability of the procedure in most states. Its terrorism, but terrorism sadly works.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8983386.post-10088519417663244102009-06-12T10:53:39.299-05:002009-06-12T10:53:39.299-05:00"...it's just that the level of ideologic..."...it's just that the level of ideological purity they want is only found in intellectual lightweights."<br /><br />The same can be said for the press who continues to flaunt this elementary junk. QuakerDave is right - Huff Post wins the award for sexism, but the rest are not far behind. <br /><br />Keep focusing on Say-ruh's toes, press. Keep Newty in the limelight full front and center and kiss Rush right on the lips. The more they're exposed, the harder they'll fall in 2010 & 2012 and beyond.Blue Roseshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18100179803379970572noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8983386.post-3452530074948702622009-06-11T18:41:04.984-05:002009-06-11T18:41:04.984-05:00Huffington Post may be, in my opinion, one of the ...Huffington Post may be, in my opinion, one of the most sexist sites on the web. Just scroll down the features on that right-hand sidebar sometime.<br /><br />Today's chestnuts:<br /><br />"Megan Fox Dons Sheer Dress in South Korea."<br /><br />"The Sarkozys Make Voting Look Sexy" (guess which one they mean)<br /><br />"Michelle's Flamboyant London Fashion..."<br /><br />Tiresome.QuakerDavehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09357878445087995583noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8983386.post-78743621444031968372009-06-11T06:50:05.696-05:002009-06-11T06:50:05.696-05:00Is it sexist to say between Palin and Sotomayor, w...Is it sexist to say between Palin and Sotomayor, who I want to see in a bikini and who I want to see in Supreme Court robes?geek_guynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8983386.post-71348746331067643612009-06-10T23:54:20.227-05:002009-06-10T23:54:20.227-05:00I believe sexism exists, I know it for a fact. You...I believe sexism exists, I know it for a fact. You have to admit though that it is really hard to take any woman seriously who paints polka dots on her toe nails and has the gall to wear open toed shoes to show em off. Seems to me that she has gotta be asking for it.<br /><br />That said, I love women, really I do, my best friends are women. I am a gay man and I LOVE women. <br /><br />Sarah Palin and most republican women ask for it when they denigrate themselves by accepting the "roles" that they are allowed to play in the republican party. <br /><br />Seriously, do you think Hillary would ever have had painted polka dots on her toes? I think not. <br /><br />Just sayin...and does that make me sexist? Maybe, I am. <br /><br />The greater problem is that women who want to be taken seriously need to stop acting like a 12 year old and when you see a woman acting like a 12 year old call her on it. <br /><br />Go ahead, slam me with it...I can take it. Any woman who runs for office has to "be" strong and act like it, in order to get elected. Is it fair? No. Is it the truth? Yes. <br /><br />All of that said, I would vote for a woman 10 times over before I vote for a man, especially for a judge, but they better have closed toed shoes and no polka dots.Travelingman Rickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12044448017559143638noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8983386.post-40292828224748457652009-06-10T12:55:54.354-05:002009-06-10T12:55:54.354-05:00It's not so much that the Republicans are tryi...It's not so much that the Republicans are trying to attract intellectual lightweights, it's just that the level of ideological purity they want is only found in intellectual lightweights. Anyone who actually thinks through any issue is unlikely to maintain an extreme position, left or right.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06775450337150077316noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8983386.post-12900903371702511782009-06-10T12:44:52.706-05:002009-06-10T12:44:52.706-05:00Terrific post, BG.
As you know, I get called out ...Terrific post, BG.<br /><br />As you know, I get called out peridically about sexism at MPS, which I firmly try to quash.<br /><br />The thing is, I pick on everyone, and I think equally. There are some news cycles where female pols are more prominent and on those days I usually get at least one accusation of sexism. But I try to stay focused on issues, not gender, but I slip now and then.<br /><br />It's good of you to post a wake-up call. I need reminders to check myself. I endeavor to do better.<br /><br />Regards,<br /><br />TengrainTengrainhttp://mockpaperscissors.comnoreply@blogger.com