[Okay once again I have my limits as to images I will or will not post but I have to admit about the one that will appear when you click here? I did laugh. A lot.]
Ha. From the Quaker pages of Beliefnet.
According to Wikipedia the controversy centres around the following issues:
1/ Whether Intelligent Design can be regarded as science.
2/ Whether the evidence supports Intelligent Design.
3/ Whether teaching Intelligent Design is appropriate.
My position on these is:
More cool religious links. (Yes, religion can be cool!)
Thorsmark has the best lengthy description of what blogs are and why they matter that I've ever read. Start halfway down the post under the heading, "Why should we care about blogs?"
The wonderful blog The Revealer tells us that once again, the claims that the religious right are dead are, well, overstated to say the least.
Love this [click image for larger]: