"Trump Administration: The Movie" aspires to answer the question: What would happen if...
...a greedy, white-nationalist, sex-creep version of Dumbledore,
....but with frontal dementia and mini-strokes,
...found himself riding an All Terrain Armored Transport to Venezuela
...in a desperate (yet possibly successful) attempt to escape the judgment of the Epstein Ring?
You'll have run out of the theater before the final credits, so here's the fifty-cent tour:
In a bizarre and failed attempt to bring in "comedy" revenue, Marco Rubio is cast as "the smart one." And all the female leads look exactly the same.
This is one mess of a story that really begs the question: why film it? Why watch it? Why? Stay away . . . and if you still decide to buy the ticket because, hey, freedom of expression and it's your country, too? Fuck you, Bozo, your Fandango points go to Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Eli Lilly, and Meta!
Fair warning, this movie is definitely not for kids. Unless you let your kids listen to you read explicit stories about pedophiles and enjoy extreme close-ups of lips damaged by gender-affirming injections. In which case, this is the movie for you . . . sicko!
My decision to never have owned a television isn't a cause for regret just now.
ReplyDelete-Doug in Sugar Pine
Ummm... Imma think I'm going to disagree with "gender affirming," there. Just like the women with the dimples that seem to have been put in place with a high powered stapler, "cosmetic" seems the appropriate term, insofar as imitating a Jackson Pollock on your face could be called "cosmetic". Now, if there's folks arguing, ag'in me, I will only grant that you simply can't argue with reasoning like that, and leave the field of "gender affirming" vs "cosmetic."
ReplyDeleteCalling Jesse Watters, Stephen Miller and Laura Ingraham "prostitutes" is an insult to sex workers.
ReplyDelete