If you hired a hooker, would she look this much like your wife and have the same first name?
Like a commenter said over at Agitprop (h/t for the idea yeah I did the graphic):
What would Wendy Cotez do that Wendy Vitter wouldn't? My guess is about everything...
UPDATE: OMG: Vitter addresses his colleagues on "rebranding" the GOP by reclaiming the fiscal conservative mantle.
Hey. Perhaps "whore" is a word we should reserve for members of the US Senate.
i thought these guys believed wives are properties that are supposed to do whatever a man wants? maybe life in the Vitter-dome is more progressive than we thought!
ReplyDeletebut to answer your question, IF i felt the need to hire someone, no she probably would not look like my wife. but quite possibly like one of her sisters, yes.
(oops, did i say that out loud?)
I can understand Vitters, and it speaks to a specific morality; Vitters wanted to [fill in the blank] but it would have been morally wrong to do it with someone other than his wife AND it would have been morally wrong to ask the mother of his children to [fill in the blank].
ReplyDelete(I think 'fill in the blank' will be my new euphemism for sex)
Maybe his wife is creeped out by grown men in pee pee pants.
ReplyDeleteI definitely think the GOP should go with whatever suggests. He obviously has his head on straight and is of sound moral judgment.
Just goes to show how little imagination Vitter has. What a creep.
ReplyDeleteWell, if they have the same first name, you can't accidentally use the hookers name when addressing your wife?
ReplyDeleteUmmm, ewwwwww.
ReplyDeleteHe should have taken his own advice to the Republicans and "rebranded" the hooker.
ReplyDeleteThat would have made alllll the difference.
I'm with SAP.
ReplyDeleteJoe,
ReplyDeleteGREAT idea. Not that I have any such inclinations. As far as looks go, No, she/they can NOT look like my wife, simply for variety's sake. I won't say who she/they could look like though.